Are We Really Deciding?

Are We Really Deciding?

Are We Really Deciding?

Design is driven by hundreds of decisions across every project, yet the quality of those decisions is rarely examined. The focus lands on the output, not the thinking behind it.

This project sits at an intersection of cognitive bias in design, asking whether designers’ decisions are truly their own. The answer became a system for examining how we think, not just what we make.

A system design project exploring our college stationery store ecosystem and the complex, interconnected systems behind its seemingly simple experience.

This project began as an intensive field study, identifying intervention points to improve the system’s flow for users and staff.

timeline

timeline

5 months / 2026

discipline

discipline

Design Research

Interaction Research

Behavioral Design

tools

tools

Figma

Miro

Cursor

skills

skills

Game Design

Framework Development

Design Strategy

discipline

Design Research

Interaction Research

Behavioral Design

timeline

5 months / 2026

tools

Figma

Miro

Cursor

skills

Game Design

Framework Design

Design Strategy

hover & select the stage
you would like to see

*deliverables are live on Miro & Figma community :)

*deliverables are live on Miro & Figma community :)

tl;dr

tl;dr

tl;dr

Retrospecting design decisions before implementation

Retrospecting design decisions before implementation

Retrospection before implementation

We think we design rationally, but most of our decisions are already shaped before we even realise we are deciding. But, most people can't explain their decisions as well as they think they can, because the decision was shaped & influeneced even before we realize.

We think we design rationally, but most of our decisions are already shaped before we even realise we are deciding. But, most people can't explain their decisions as well as they think they can, because the decision was shaped & influeneced even before we realize.

problem

problem

Influence of external factors over design decisions without concious awareness, which ultimately impacts the quality of work delivered

Influence of external factors over design decisions without concious awareness, which ultimately impacts the quality of work delivered

solution

solution

A system that is asking you to challenge and retrospect your thinking before implementing the decisions made along the way

A system that is asking you to challenge and retrospect your thinking before implementing the decisions made along the way

impact

impact

Shifting the focus from output quality to thinking quality, making the reasoning behind design decisions more visible and intentional

Shifting the focus from output quality to thinking quality, making the reasoning behind design decisions more visible and intentional

problem

Influence of external factors over design decisions without concious awareness, which ultimately impacts the quality of work delivered

solution

A system that is asking you to challenge and retrospect your thinking before implementing the decisions made along the way

impact

Shifting the focus from output quality to thinking quality, making the reasoning behind design decisions more visible and intentional

context

context

context

Thinking quality > Output quality

Thinking quality > Output quality

Thinking quality > Output quality

Every decision emerges from a quality of thinking.

Every decision emerges from a quality of thinking.

Every decision emerges from a quality of thinking.

In creative workflows, our thinking is rarely neutral. Assumptions, pressure, familiarity, emotional attachment, and validation quietly shape how we evaluate ideas, define concepts, and move toward decisions, often before we realize it.

In creative workflows, our thinking is rarely neutral. Assumptions, pressure, familiarity, emotional attachment, and validation quietly shape how we evaluate ideas, define concepts, and move toward decisions, often before we realize it.

The problem isn’t decision-making itself, but unseen influences shaping it. If the thinking is skewed, the output seen will be too, no matter how polished it looks in the end.

The problem isn’t decision-making itself, but unseen influences shaping it. If the thinking is skewed, the output seen will be too, no matter how polished it looks in the end.

problem

problem

problem

The silent decision shaper

The silent decision shapers

The silent decision shaper

Cognitive biases shape decisions in ways designers rarely see or examine, with no clear way to address them. The process began to feel like Chinese whispers, where unseen influences distort ideas and good ones get lost.

Cognitive biases shape decisions in ways designers rarely see or examine, with no clear way to address them. The process began to feel like Chinese whispers, where unseen influences distort ideas and good ones get lost.

direct impact on quality of output

domino effect of decisions

authenticity of your decision

research

research

research

Framework Analysis

Framework analysis

Framework Analysis

Naturally, the initial desk research began by understanding frameworks as both a concept and a tool within design and decision-making.

Naturally, the initial desk research began by understanding frameworks as both a concept and a tool within design and decision-making.

Two buckets proved most useful, the stage of use, and the insights each framework offered for this project.

Two buckets proved most useful, the stage of use, and the insights each framework offered for this project.

20

frameworks studied

10

made it to the table

04

proved to be useful

20

frameworks studied

10

made it to the table

04

proved to be useful

Hear it from the designers

Hear it from the designers

The research now moved to the people living the problem. Open-ended interviews explored how they navigate their process, where they get stuck, how do they respond to it.

The research now moved to the people living the problem. Open-ended interviews explored how they navigate their process, where they get stuck, how do they respond to it.

target audience

target audience

Design Students

Design Students

Creative Professionals

Creative Professionals

interview count

interview count

08 design students

08 design students

04 creative professionals

04 creative professionals

timeline

timeline

Round 1: January 2026

Round 1: January 2026

Round 2: February 2026

Round 2: February 2026

questionnaire

questionnaire

12 questions in set A

12 questions in set A

06 questions in set B

06 questions in set B

target audience

Design Students

Design Seniors

interview count

08 design students

04 design seniors

timeline

Round 1: Jan 2026

Round 2: Feb 2026

questionnaire

12 questions in set A

06 questions in set B

tl;dr

tl;dr

tl;dr

Making sense of data

Making sense of data

Making sense of data

Design is driven by hundreds of decisions across every project, yet the quality of those decisions is rarely examined. The focus lands on the output, not the thinking behind it.

This project sits at an intersection of cognitive bias in design, asking whether designers’ decisions are truly their own. The answer became a system for examining how we think, not just what we make.

Design is driven by hundreds of decisions across every project, yet the quality of those decisions is rarely examined. The focus lands on the output, not the thinking behind it.

This project sits at an intersection of cognitive bias in design, asking whether designers’ decisions are truly their own. The answer became a system for examining how we think, not just what we make.

funnel research

funnel research

funnel research

A sharper lens to understand the problem

A sharper lens to understand the problem

A sharper lens to understand the problem

To sharpen the direction, primary research returned to designers with a sharper lens. A survey gathered perspectives from a direct but more diverse pool of designers, helping define the problem more precisely.

To sharpen the direction, primary research returned to designers with a sharper lens. A survey gathered perspectives from a direct but more diverse pool of designers, helping define the problem more precisely.

To sharpen the direction, primary research returned to designers with a sharper lens. A survey gathered perspectives from a direct but more diverse pool of designers, helping define the problem more precisely.

down to the

T everything mentioned!

down to the

T everything mentioned!

synthesis

synthesis

synthesis

Patterns turned into clear opportunities

Patterns turned into clear opportunities

Patterns turned into clear opportunities

Bringing in a huge pool of data into 3 key top findings, reading
carefully to make sure to not dilute the richness of data collected,

whilst deriving to a logical pathway to build the project further.

Bringing in a huge pool of data into 3 key top findings, reading
carefully to make sure to not dilute the richness of data collected,

whilst deriving to a logical pathway to build the project further.

Bringing in a huge pool of data into 3 key top findings, reading carefully to make sure to not dilute the richness of data collected, while making sure in deriving to a logical pathway to build the project further.

Top Findings How Might We? Opportunity Areas

Top Findings How Might We? Opportunity Areas

of designers have

admitted external factors to

end up shape the decisions

72%

of designers said

they can identify well when

are in the middle of a loop

62%

of designers have

experienced their concepts

shifting along their process

55%

Help designers recognize cognitive bias as it happens during the process?

01 / how might we?

Make hidden thinking patterns visible, encourage self reflection & perspective?

02 / how might we?

Reconnect designers to their original intent when they've drifted?

03 / how might we?

Help designers recognize cognitive bias as it happens during the process?

01 / how might we?

Make hidden thinking patterns visible, encourage self reflection & perspective?

02 / how might we?

Reconnect designers to their original intent when they've drifted?

03 / how might we?

Help designers recognize cognitive bias as it happens during the process?

01 / how might we?

Make hidden thinking patterns visible, encourage self reflection & perspective?

02 / how might we?

Reconnect designers to their original intent when they've drifted?

03 / how might we?

Help designers recognize cognitive bias as it happens during the process?

01 / how might we?

Make hidden thinking patterns visible, encourage self reflection & perspective?

02 / how might we?

Reconnect designers to their original intent when they've drifted?

03 / how might we?

invisible to visible

Help enable designers to uncover

what is shaping their decisions.

awareness layer

Help enable designers to uncover what is shaping their decisions.

retrospect the decision

Shift from defending drifts and

decisions to examining them.

invisible to visible

Help enable designers to uncover

what is shaping their decisions.

awareness layer

Help enable designers to uncover what is shaping their decisions.

retrospect the decision

Shift from defending drifts and

decisions to examining them.

invisible to visible

Help enable designers to uncover

what is shaping their decisions.

awareness layer

Help enable designers to uncover what is shaping their decisions.

retrospect the decision

Shift from defending drifts and

decisions to examining them.

invisible to visible

Help enable designers to uncover

what is shaping their decisions.

awareness layer

Help enable designers to uncover what is shaping their decisions.

retrospect the decision

Shift from defending drifts and

decisions to examining them.

Top Findings

72%

of designers have admitted external factors to end up shape their decisions

62%

of designers said they can identify well when are in the middle of a loop

55%

of designers have experienced their concepts shifting along their process

Opportunity Areas

invisible to visible

Help enable designers to uncover from whats shaping their decisions

awareness layer

Create moments to step out of overwhelming work cycles.

retrospect the decision

Shift from defending drifts to examining and questioning them

How Might We?

Help designers recognize their bias as it happens during the process?

01 / how might we?

Make hidden thinking patterns visible, encourage self reflection?

02 / how might we?

Reconnect designers to their original intent when they've drifted?

03 / how might we?

tl;dr

tl;dr

tl;dr

Thinking about the quality of thinking; metacognition

Thinking about the quality of thinking; metacognition

Thinking about the quality of thinking; metacognition

Bias, assumptions and external influences can quietly compound from one stage to the next, while simply recognising the problem rarely helps designers break the pattern.

The project needed to intervene at a stage of creating an retrospection layer within the process that makes influences visible, catches drift, and turns questioning your own thinking into part of good design practice.

Bias, assumptions and external influences can quietly compound from one stage to the next, while simply recognising the problem rarely helps designers break the pattern.

The project needed to intervene at a stage of creating an retrospection layer within the process that makes influences visible, catches drift, and turns questioning your own thinking into part of good design practice.

framework thinking

framework thinking

framework thinking

Structural foundation first approach

Structural foundation first approach

Help me have something I can practice by myself, without external validation or dependencies

Help me have something I can practice by myself, without external validation or dependencies

Product Designer / Student

Product Designer / Student

A simple nudge, not too overwhelming, easy to understand and challenges my decision, in every stage

A simple nudge, not overwhelming, easy to understand and challenges my decision, in every stage

UX Designer / Professional

UX Designer / Professional

Until this stage, the research had named the problem; the next step was to give it shape and build a solution to solve it.

Until this stage, the research had named the problem; the next step was to give it shape and build a solution to solve it.

The aim was to create something within the design process that structures what is known, assumed, and missing, an attempt at creating moments of examined thinking at the point of decision making.

The aim was to create something within the design process that structures what is known, assumed, and missing, an attempt at creating moments of examined thinking at the point of decision making.

This is when framework thinking stepped in.

This is when framework thinking stepped in.

domino effect of decisions

authenticity of your decision

open for opportunities!

direct impact on quality of output

MAP Framework

MAP Framework

MAP Framework

Decision, Thinking, Intent

Decision, Thinking, Intent

Decision, Thinking, Intent

M

M

map your

decisions

map your

decisions

A

A

access your

thinking

access your

thinking

P

P

position

your intent

position

your intent

A mid-process, stage-agnostic framework that helps designers pause, examine, and make the thinking behind their decisions visible before they settle.

A mid-process, stage-agnostic framework that helps designers pause, examine, and make the thinking behind their decisions visible before they settle.

Rather than looking back, the framework works within the process, breaking down decisions, surfacing assumptions, questioning the thinking behind them.

Rather than looking back, the framework works within the process, breaking down decisions, surfacing assumptions, questioning the thinking behind them.

the what

A framework that helps designers examine decisions in the moment. Through Map, Assess, Position, it creates a structured pause to surface influences and check alignment with project intent.

the what

A framework that helps designers examine decisions in the moment. Through Map, Assess, Position, it creates a structured pause to surface influences and check alignment with project intent.

the what

A framework that helps designers examine decisions when in the moment. Through Map, Assess, and Position, it creates a structured pause to surface influences and to check alignment with project intent.

the what

A framework that helps designers examine decisions in the moment. Through Map, Assess, Position, it creates a structured pause to surface influences and check alignment with project intent.

the what

A framework that helps designers examine decisions in the moment. Through Map, Assess, Position, it creates a structured pause to surface influences and check alignment with project intent.

the why

MAP addresses the gap between process and decision-making, where bias can quietly take over. It makes the thinking behind a decision visible before it shapes what comes next.

the why

MAP addresses the gap between process and decision-making, where bias can quietly take over. It makes the thinking behind a decision visible before it shapes what comes next, solely with the idea of retrospecting your decisions.

the why

MAP addresses the gap between process and decision-making, where bias can quietly take over. It makes the thinking behind a decision visible before it shapes what comes next.

the why

MAP addresses the gap between process and decision-making, where bias can quietly take over. It makes the thinking behind a decision visible before it shapes what comes next.

the why

MAP addresses the gap between process and decision-making, where bias can quietly take over. It makes the thinking behind a decision visible before it shapes what comes next.

01

Map Your Decision

02

Access Your Thinking

03

Position Your Intent

01

Map Your Decision

02

Access Your Thinking

03

Position Your Intent

01

Map Your Decision

02

Access Your Thinking

03

Position Your Intent

01

Map Your Decision

02

Access Your Thinking

03

Position Your Intent

01

Map Your Decision

02

Access Your Thinking

03

Position Your Intent

tl;dr

major pivot

tl;dr

What worked with the user

What worked with the user

The matrix created meaningful friction. Designers paused, reconsidered, and sometimes changed direction, making hidden biases visible and broadening perspectives.

The matrix created meaningful friction. Designers paused, looked into it, reconsidered, and sometimes changed direction, making common but hidden biases visible and broadening perspectives.

What pushed me further

What pushed me further

MAP is a micro lens for individual decisions. Larger, more complex decisions require a broader, macro-level view across the project.

MAP is a micro lens for individual decisions. Larger, more complex decisions require a broader, macro-level view across the project. Where a high stakes decision is being tested and checked.

The matrix created meaningful friction. Designers paused, reconsidered, and sometimes changed direction, making hidden biases visible and broadening perspectives.

What worked with the user

MAP is a micro lens for individual decisions. Larger, more complex decisions require a broader, macro-level view across the project.

What pushed me further

core concept

core concept

core concept

Zoom out to project lens; test it with Decision Sprint

Zoom out to project lens; test it with Decision Sprint

Zoom out to project lens; test it with Decision Sprint

MAP helped with indiviual decisions, but what happens when we want to examine a whole set of decisions across a project?

MAP helped with individual decisions, but what happens when we want to examine a whole set of decisions across a project?

MAP helped with indiviual decisions, but what happens when we want to examine a whole set of decisions across a project?

Here's Decision Sprint for it. A two day workshop format, that brings designer's decision landscape into one structured space, helping teams examine what is shaping their direction before committing to it.

Here's Decision Sprint for it. A two day workshop format, that brings designer's decision landscape into one structured space, helping teams examine what is shaping their direction before committing to it.

Here's Decision Sprint for it. A two day workshop format, that brings designer's decision landscape into one structured space, helping teams examine what is shaping their direction before committing to it.

800+

800+

views on Miroverse

views on Miroverse

15+

15+

user interactions

user interactions

10+

10+

likes on template :)

likes on template :)

800+

views on Miroverse

15+

user interactions

10+

likes on template :)

sprint format

sprint format

2 days duration

2 days duration

Online + Offline mode

Online + Offline mode

target auidence

target auidence

Design Teams

Design Teams

Innovation Projects

Innovation Projects

Startup Teams

Startup Teams

scale of impact

scale of impact

Project level

Project level

aim to achieve

aim to achieve

Examine what is shapes the decision before freezing it

Examine what is shapes the decision before freezing it

sprint format

2 days duration

Online + Offline mode

target auidence

Design Teams

Innovation Projects

Startup Teams

impact scale

Project level

aim to achieve

Examine what is shapes the decision before freezing it

breaking it down

breaking it down

breaking it down

Set of deliberate interventions for your decision

Set of deliberate interventions for your decision

Each activity is designed with a thought, a structure and a stage where it will challenged your thinking through multiple perspectives.

Each activity is designed with a thought, a structure and a stage where it will challenged your thinking through multiple perspectives.

Each activity is designed with a thought, a structure and a stage where it will challenged your thinking through multiple perspectives.

Before deep diving into each activity and how it benefits the user, here's a direct ROI or impacts on the user based on how the sprint is shaped, planned and executed.

Before deep diving into each activity and how it benefits the user, here's a direct ROI or impacts on the user based on how the sprint is shaped, planned and executed.

01

01

A decision you actually know

A decision you actually know

A decision you actually know

Not just one that felt right, but one you’ve examined and challenged.

Not just one that felt right, but one you’ve examined and challenged.

02

02

Insight into your thinking

Insight into your thinking

Insight into your thinking

See the influences, assumptions, and biases behind your decision.

See the influences, assumptions, and biases behind your decision.

03

03

Conscious intent ahead

Conscious intent work forward

Conscious intent ahead

Know where you are and why you’re moving forward.

Know where you are and why you’re moving forward.

intent behind the sprint?

look below ↓

every task given is intentional, play it honestly

intent behind the sprint?

look below ↓

every task given is intentional, play it honestly

Day 01

Day 01

Breakdown the Decision

Breakdown the Decision

First things first, take the decision apart before trying to improve

it. Start by establishing where the decision currently stands, then deliberately introduces friction to expose what is missing, what could fail, and what is actually working.

First things first, take the decision apart before trying to improve it. Start by establishing where the decision currently stands, then deliberately introduces friction to expose what is missing, what could fail, and what is actually working.

01

01

establish a baseline

establish

a baseline

02

02

creating

a friction

creating

a friction

03

03

examine

the thinking

examine

the thinking

Day 02

Day 02

Reposition the Decision

Reposition the Decision

Now, put the decision back together with a clearer vision ahead

of what’s shaping it. Start by uncovering the influences and assumptions behind it, then reconnect the decision to the need, problem, and intent it was meant to serve.

Now, put the decision back together with a clearer understanding

of what’s shaping it. Start by uncovering the influences and assumptions behind it, then reconnect the decision to the problem, need, and intent it was meant to serve.

01

understand the influences

02

challenge the

assumptions

03

reposition

the intent

Now, put the decision back together with a clearer vision ahead of what’s shaping it. Start by uncovering the influences and assumptions behind it, then reconnect the decision to the need, problem, and intent it was meant to serve.

01

understand

the influences

02

challenge the

assumptions

03

reposition

the intent

bias library

bias library

Get to know your biases

Get to know your biases

Cognitive biases can be difficult to understand when its abstract and intangible. So, the top 10 biases identified through the research were turned into characters, giving them a personality.

Cognitive biases can be difficult to understand when its abstract and intangible. So, the top 10 biases identified through the research were turned into characters, giving them a personality.

It makes bias easier to see, recognise, and understand, without them feeling intimidating.

It makes bias easier to see, recognise, and understand, without them feeling intimidating.

Same biases, now questioning you

Same biases, now questioning you

Same biases, now questioning you

The cards use uncomfortable, bias-led questions to push designers beyond their first instinct, helping them examine a decision through different biases and uncover what might be shaping their thinking.

The cards use uncomfortable, bias-led questions to push designers beyond their first instinct, helping them examine a decision through different biases and uncover what might be shaping their thinking.

AfterBefore

behavioral game

behavioral game

Choose fast, Defend or Dump?

Choose fast, Defend or Dump?

Under pressure, deliberate thinking gives way to quicker, more instinctive choices, allowing underlying patterns to surface. This game intentionally creates that pressure, using fast paced stimulation and a ticking clock to reveal choices made without much conscious reasoning.

Under pressure, deliberate thinking gives way to quicker, more instinctive choices, allowing underlying patterns to surface. This game intentionally creates that pressure, using fast paced stimulation and a ticking clock to reveal choices made without much conscious reasoning.

The tower then holds those choices up as a visible pattern, making the player reflect on what their mind was drawn to.

The tower then holds those choices up as a visible pattern, making the player reflect on what their mind was drawn to.

vibe coded with Cursor + Figma Make

vibe coded with Cursor + Figma Make

played by

30+ users!

played by

30+ users!

cognitive bias website

cognitive bias website

The system needed a home

The system needed a home

Somewhere the tools could live beyond the project, remain accessible, and allow designers to explore and practise examining their decisions on their own.

Somewhere the tools could live beyond the project, remain accessible, and allow designers to explore and practise examining their decisions on their own.

01

01

Framework guide

Guide to framework

Framework guide

02

02

Play bias games

Play bias games

03

03

Visit character library

Visit character library

04

04

Long format blogs

Long format blogs

the impact

the impact

01

01

Questioning over defending

Questioning over defending

Creating a space to question what feels right before committing, retrospection before implementing.

Creating a space to question what feels right before committing, retrospection before implementing.

02

02

Know your decisions

Know your decisions

Strip back the noise to understand what is truly driving your decision and what it is built on at its core.

Strip back the noise to understand what is truly driving your decision and what it is built on at its core.

03

03

Output to thinking quality

Output to thinking quality

Move beyond judging what you make to examining the thinking and reasoning behind why you made it.

Move beyond judging what you make to examining the thinking and reasoning behind why you made it.

01

Stop defending, start questioning

Create space to challenge what feels right, question what is shaping the decision, and examine it before committing.

02

Knowing what is driving your decisions

Strip back the noise to understand what is truly driving your decision and what it is built on at its core.

03

Shifting from output to thinking quality

Move beyond judging what you make to examining the thinking and reasoning behind why you made it.

reflections

reflections

Bias is human; work with it, not against

Bias is human; work with them, not against

Bias is deeply rooted in how we think, feel, and respond as a human; the goal isn’t to eliminate it, but to recognise when it’s shaping our decisions.

Bias is deeply rooted in how we think, feel, and respond as a human; the goal isn’t to eliminate it, but to recognise when it’s shaping our decisions. Knowing what you are working with, rather than being blindsided to it.

Design thinking process is rarely linear

Behind every outcome is a layered process of judgement, emotion, influence, assumptions, and shifting decisions that deserves as much attention as the final output.

A system design project exploring our college stationery store ecosystem and the complex, interconnected systems behind its seemingly simple experience.

Bias is human; work with it, not against

This project began as an intensive field study, identifying intervention points to improve the system’s flow for users and staff.

Design thinking process is rarely linear

final jury!

final jury!

As we wrap up this case study, I wanted to take a moment to reflect on where this project came from for me. It started from a place that felt genuine, true to who I am as a designer, and to what I believe design should ask of its practitioners along design processes.

Truthfully, the subject of cognitive bias is not one that can be fully solved. Bias is human; it is persistent. This project stands not as a polished solution, but as a starting point, a set of tools built on the belief that retrospection is where change can begin.

As we wrap up this case study, I wanted to take a moment to reflect on where this project came from for me. It started from a place that felt genuine, true to who I am as a designer, and to what I believe design should ask of its practitioners along design processes.

Truthfully, the subject of cognitive bias is not one that can be fully solved. Bias is human; it is persistent. This project stands not as a polished solution, but as a starting point, a set of tools built on the belief that retrospection is where change can begin.

prev project

next project

next project